Trusted by 50,000+ farmers across 11 statesFree delivery above ₹999Cash on delivery
🛒 Shop
NanoKhetiArticle 25 · Bio-inputs · Explainer
Innovations & Patents
On this pageJump to a section
  1. In Brief
  2. What PGPR Are
  3. Hyphosphere
  4. Sugar for Phosphorus
  5. Research
  6. On Your Farm
  7. FAQ
  8. Sources
Explainer · Bio-inputs

Mycorrhiza and friendly bacteria: VAM with PSB, Azotobacter and Rhizobium

Mycorrhizal fungi feed, attract and even carry helpful soil bacteria. What happens when VAM is combined with bacterial biofertilizers, what Indian field trials found, and how to combine them without wasting money.

In brief

  • PGPR are helpful root-zone bacteria, sold in India as biofertilizers: Rhizobium, Azotobacter, Azospirillum, PSB and others. Trichoderma is a fungus, not one of them.
  • Mycorrhizal threads have their own crowd of bacteria. In lab studies the fungus fed a phosphate-solubilising bacterium and even carried bacteria along its threads to locked phosphorus, then took up the phosphorus they freed.
  • At seven Indian sites, wheat with mycorrhiza plus Pseudomonas yielded 41% more, against 29% and 31% with each alone.
  • Combinations often add up rather than multiply, and some pairs, such as mycorrhiza and Trichoderma, can hold each other back.
  • Match the partner to the crop, use tested combinations, keep phosphorus moderate, and test any fertiliser cut on a strip first.

What PGPR are

PGPR, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, are bacteria that live on and around roots and help the crop: some fix nitrogen from the air, some free phosphorus or potassium locked in the soil, some make growth hormones or help protect roots. In India the main ones are sold as biofertilizers under the Fertiliser (Control) Order, which lists, among others, Rhizobium, Azotobacter, Azospirillum, phosphate-solubilising bacteria (PSB), potassium-mobilising and zinc-solubilising bacteria, mixed consortia and mycorrhizal biofertilizer (VAM).2

Trichoderma, often sold alongside them, is not a bacterium but a fungus, used mainly to protect roots from disease.3 The difference matters, as we will see.

Mycorrhizal threads have their own bacteria

A mycorrhizal fungus is fed by the plant: in a study on cucumber, about a fifth of the carbon the plant fixed was used by the mycorrhiza.4 Part of that carbon leaks out of the fungal threads into the soil, and bacteria gather to use it.

The thin layer of soil around the threads, called the hyphosphere, holds its own set of bacteria. In one study the same kinds of bacteria gathered on the threads within 14 days, in different soils and with two different fungi.5 Substances released by the fungus speed up bacterial growth and change which bacteria thrive.6 Roots that carry mycorrhiza also draw more of some helpful bacteria: fluorescent Pseudomonas and Azotobacter moved towards mycorrhizal tomato roots more strongly than towards roots without it.7

A trade: sugar for phosphorus

The clearest example of teamwork involves phosphorus. Much of the soil's phosphorus is locked in organic forms, such as phytate, that neither the plant nor the fungus can use directly. Some phosphate-solubilising bacteria can release it.

In laboratory studies, a mycorrhizal fungus fed a phosphate-solubilising bacterium with carbon, the bacterium released phosphorus from organic compounds, and the fungus took up the phosphorus the bacterium released.8 A sugar released by the fungus, fructose, even switched on the bacterium's phosphorus-releasing enzymes.9 And the fungal threads carried bacteria along their surface to patches of organic phosphorus out of the roots' reach, like a highway.10 Only bacteria that can swim use this highway.11

These results come from laboratory and pot systems. They explain why the pairing can work; how much it adds in a field is a separate question.

Mycorrhiza with common bio-inputs: what the research shows
PartnerWhat it doesWith mycorrhiza
Rhizobium (pulses)Fixes nitrogen in root nodulesOften more growth than either alone; across 88 studies the gain was additive in annual legumes such as most pulses, and greater than additive only in perennial legumes
PSBReleases locked phosphorusLab: fungus feeds the bacterium, bacterium frees phosphorus. Dryland chickpea: more pods per plant with both than with either alone
Fluorescent PseudomonasGrowth promotion; some protect rootsWheat at seven Indian sites: +41% yield with both, +29% and +31% with each alone
Azotobacter, AzospirillumFix nitrogen near the rootAzotobacter is drawn to mycorrhizal roots; we found no published Indian field trial measuring the combination
Trichoderma (a fungus)Protects roots from diseaseCan reduce mycorrhiza and attack its threads; some strain pairs work, others do not

What the research shows

In Indian fields. At seven sites from the Himalayan foothills to the Indo-Gangetic plain, wheat inoculated with a mix of mycorrhizal fungi and two fluorescent Pseudomonas strains yielded 41% more grain than uninoculated wheat; mycorrhiza alone gave 29% more and Pseudomonas alone 31%. Gains were largest where yields had been low.12 In dryland chickpea, PSB and VAM together gave more pods per plant than either alone.13

Often additive, not multiplied. A review of co-inoculation studies found that bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi together often add their effects rather than multiply them.14 With legumes, rhizobia and mycorrhiza helped each other most in perennial legumes; in annual legumes the effects simply added up.15 In one detailed study the two partners boosted a legume's growth together, but rhizobia reduced the mycorrhiza and the benefit depended on soil phosphorus.16

Some pairs work against each other. Trichoderma harzianum reduced root colonisation by a mycorrhizal fungus, while the mycorrhizal fungus held back the Trichoderma,17 and Trichoderma can attack mycorrhizal threads and enter roots through them.18 More on mycorrhiza and root diseases: can mycorrhiza protect crops from root rot, wilt and nematodes?

Results depend on place. Across 171 published studies, biofertilizers raised yields by about 8.5% on average in continental climates and about 20% in dry climates, and mycorrhiza worked best in soils low in organic matter with a near-neutral pH.19

Cutting fertiliser. In a greenhouse, tomato inoculated with PGPR and mycorrhiza at 75% of the recommended fertiliser did as well as plants on the full dose.20 That is promising, but it is one greenhouse study; field results vary, so claims of much larger fertiliser savings should be tested before you rely on them.

Helper bacteria. Some bacteria help mycorrhiza form or work better; scientists call them mycorrhiza helper bacteria. Most of that research is on the mycorrhiza of trees,21 and products built around such helpers for field crops are still new.

How to use mycorrhiza with bacterial biofertilizers

  1. Match the partner to the crop. Use the Rhizobium strain made for your pulse, PSB on most crops, and VAM on any crop except the mustard, cabbage and beet families (see types of mycorrhiza).
  2. Buy registered, fresh products. Check the FCO registration, the live count and the expiry date: for VAM, look for infective propagules per gram (see how to judge a VAM product).
  3. Follow the label on mixing. Use combinations that have been tested together. Do not mix bacteria or VAM with chemical fungicides, or with Trichoderma in the same treatment, unless the label says they are compatible.
  4. Keep phosphorus moderate. Apply it according to a soil test; across field studies, phosphorus fertiliser reduced mycorrhiza by 32% on average.22
  5. Test before you cut. If you want to reduce fertiliser, try it on a strip of the field first and compare the yield.

For a tested combination of friendly microbes against a crop disease, see biochar and friendly microbes against brinjal blight.

Editor's note: this article is based on a technical note by Dr. Abhishek Mathur. NanoKheti's editors rewrote it in plain language, checked each statement against the published research listed under Sources, and added the Indian field results, the summary, table, questions and links.

Questions · Mycorrhiza

Frequently Asked Questions

Can VAM be used with PSB?

Yes. Mycorrhizal fungi and phosphate-solubilising bacteria can work as a team: in laboratory studies the fungus fed the bacterium with carbon and took up the phosphorus the bacterium released from organic forms. In dryland chickpea, PSB and VAM together gave more pods per plant than either alone. Follow the label on how to apply them.

Can mycorrhiza be used with Rhizobium on pulses?

Yes. Mycorrhiza helps supply the phosphorus that nodules need, and the two often give more growth together than either alone. Across 88 studies the effects simply added up in annual legumes, such as most pulses, and were greater than additive only in perennial legumes. Use the Rhizobium strain made for your crop.

Can I use mycorrhiza with Trichoderma?

With care. Trichoderma is a fungus that protects roots from disease, but in one experiment it reduced root colonisation by a mycorrhizal fungus, and the mycorrhizal fungus held back the Trichoderma. Use combinations that have been tested together and do not mix them in one treatment unless the label allows it.

Do biofertilizer combinations let me cut fertiliser?

Sometimes, but not reliably. In a greenhouse, tomato with PGPR and mycorrhiza at 75% of the recommended fertiliser did as well as the full dose, but field results vary with soil, climate and crop. Test any cut on a strip of the field before applying it to the whole crop.

What is the hyphosphere?

The hyphosphere is the thin layer of soil around the threads of a mycorrhizal fungus. It holds its own set of bacteria, which feed on substances released by the fungus; some of them help release phosphorus that the fungus then takes up.

Is Trichoderma a PGPR?

No. PGPR means plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, which are bacteria. Trichoderma is a fungus, used mainly to protect roots from soil-borne diseases, and it can interfere with mycorrhizal fungi.

Sources · About the researcher

Sources

  1. Mathur, A. (2026). Microbe-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere: mycorrhizal fungi as architects inviting and orchestrating plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Technical note shared with NanoKheti.Basis of this article
  2. Government of India. (1985, as amended). Fertiliser (Inorganic, Organic or Mixed) (Control) Order, 1985, Schedule III: biofertilisers.Biofertilizers notified in India
  3. Harman, G. E., Howell, C. R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., & Lorito, M. (2004). Trichoderma species: opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2(1), 43–56.Trichoderma is a fungus
  4. Jakobsen, I., & Rosendahl, L. (1990). Carbon flow into soil and external hyphae from roots of mycorrhizal cucumber plants. New Phytologist, 115(1), 77–83.About a fifth of the plant’s carbon goes to the mycorrhiza
  5. Emmett, B. D., Lévesque-Tremblay, V., & Harrison, M. J. (2021). Conserved and reproducible bacterial communities associate with extraradical hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The ISME Journal, 15(8), 2276–2288.Fungal threads carry their own set of bacteria
  6. Toljander, J. F., et al. (2007). Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelial exudates on soil bacterial growth and community structure. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 61(2), 295–304.What the fungus releases feeds bacteria
  7. Sood, S. G. (2003). Chemotactic response of plant-growth-promoting bacteria towards roots of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal tomato plants. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 45(3), 219–227.Pseudomonas and Azotobacter drawn to mycorrhizal roots
  8. Zhang, L., Xu, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, F., Hodge, A., & Feng, G. (2016). Carbon and phosphorus exchange may enable cooperation between an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and a phosphate-solubilizing bacterium. New Phytologist, 210(3), 1022–1032.Sugar for phosphorus between fungus and PSB
  9. Zhang, L., Feng, G., & Declerck, S. (2018). Signal beyond nutrient, fructose, exuded by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus triggers phytate mineralization by a phosphate solubilizing bacterium. The ISME Journal, 12(10), 2339–2351.The fungus’s sugar switches on the bacterium
  10. Jiang, F., Zhang, L., Zhou, J., George, T. S., & Feng, G. (2021). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance mineralisation of organic phosphorus by carrying bacteria along their extraradical hyphae. New Phytologist, 230(1), 304–315.Bacteria travel along fungal threads
  11. Kohlmeier, S., et al. (2005). Taking the fungal highway: mobilization of pollutant-degrading bacteria by fungi. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 4640–4646.Only swimming bacteria use the highway
  12. Mäder, P., et al. (2011). Inoculation of root microorganisms for sustainable wheat–rice and wheat–black gram rotations in India. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(3), 609–619.Seven Indian sites: wheat +41%
  13. Pramanik, K., & Singh, R. K. (2003). Effect of levels and mode of phosphorus and biofertilizers on chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under dryland conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 48(4), 294–296.Dryland chickpea with PSB and VAM
  14. Berrios, L., et al. (2024). Co-inoculations of bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi often drive additive plant growth responses. ISME Communications, 4(1), ycae104.Combinations usually add up, not multiply
  15. Primieri, S., Magnoli, S. M., Koffel, T., Stürmer, S. L., & Bever, J. D. (2022). Perennial, but not annual legumes synergistically benefit from infection with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia: a meta-analysis. New Phytologist, 233(1), 505–514.88 studies: legumes with both partners
  16. Larimer, A. L., Clay, K., & Bever, J. D. (2014). Synergism and context dependency of interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia with a prairie legume. Ecology, 95, 1045–1054.Mycorrhiza and Rhizobium on one legume
  17. Green, H., Larsen, J., Olsson, P. A., Jensen, D. F., & Jakobsen, I. (1999). Suppression of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum by mycelium of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices in root-free soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65(4), 1428–1434.Trichoderma and mycorrhiza held each other back
  18. De Jaeger, N., Declerck, S., & de la Providencia, I. E. (2010). Mycoparasitism of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a pathway for the entry of saprotrophic fungi into roots. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 73(2), 312–322.Trichoderma can attack mycorrhizal threads
  19. Schütz, L., et al. (2018). Improving crop yield and nutrient use efficiency via biofertilization: a global meta-analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 2204.171 papers: biofertilizer yield gains by climate
  20. Adesemoye, A. O., Torbert, H. A., & Kloepper, J. W. (2009). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microbial Ecology, 58, 921–929.Greenhouse tomato at 75% fertiliser
  21. Frey-Klett, P., Garbaye, J., & Tarkka, M. (2007). The mycorrhiza helper bacteria revisited. New Phytologist, 176(1), 22–36.Mycorrhiza helper bacteria
  22. Treseder, K. K. (2004). A meta-analysis of mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen, phosphorus, and atmospheric CO2 in field studies. New Phytologist, 164(2), 347–355.Phosphorus fertiliser and mycorrhiza

Rewritten in plain language by NanoKheti from Dr. Abhishek Mathur's technical note, and reviewed by him before publication. Figures are as reported in the sources above; results in your field will depend on the crop, soil and management.

About the researcher

Dr. Abhishek Mathur

Board Advisor · Innovation & Patents

NanoKheti's Board Advisor for Innovation & Patents. An agricultural biotechnologist with more than 20 years in research and industry, he works on bio-fertilizers, mycorrhiza and beneficial soil microbes.

Science-Backed. Farmer-First.

Have a question about your soil or crop? Our agri experts answer on WhatsApp.